Now Accepting Applications for the GPP Online Training Course!

AVAC is pleased to announce the sixth offering of our global Good Participatory Practice (GPP) Online Training Course. Through online lessons, personal feedback and discussions with faculty, participants will strengthen their strategic planning skills and learn to translate GPP theory into real-world practice!

Applications are due by Wednesday, April 4. Download the application here.

Stakeholder engagement is increasingly recognized as essential for sustaining support for research and generating solutions to complex ethical and operational challenges. The question is no longer “should we engage?” but rather “who and how do we engage for greatest impact?”

The course explores the Good Participatory Practice Guidelines, a normative framework that lays out specific standards for involving stakeholders throughout the clinical trial process. The course is designed for anyone who is responsible for stakeholder engagement at a trial site or who wants to deepen their skill set related to GPP implementation.

The course will run from April 11-June 15, 2018 and learners should expect to spend approximately 2-4 hours on coursework each week.

Download the application here and submit it to [email protected] by Wednesday, April 4. For more information or questions, please contact Jessica Salzwedel ([email protected]).

CROI 2018: Highlights and what’s next for advocates

[UPDATED: slides and audio from our webinar series are now available below.]

Historically, the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (more commonly known as CROI) is heavy on basic science and early-phase research. Data from these types of studies were still prominent in 2018 (see Jon Cohen’s excellent Science article on new animal data informing cure and vaccine research). This year the meeting also broadened its lens from the lab to the ways that different strategies are, or might, have an impact in the context of people’s complex lives.

Dapivirine Ring: Guess what, women use it when they know what works!

The dapivirine vaginal ring is a silicone ring containing an antiretroviral that is released slowly over time. It’s been designed to be worn by women for around a month. Two years ago, at CROI 2016, the ASPIRE and Ring Study results showed that the dapivirine vaginal ring is safe and reduces the risk of HIV infection by around 30 percent overall among women enrolled in the study. At CROI 2018, interim data from the open-label extension (OLE) trials of the ring—HOPE and DREAM—showed that the ring reduced risk by 50 percent. In the open-label studies, all participants have been given access to the dapivirine ring to use monthly for up to 12 months. There is no placebo and all participants are told about the safety and efficacy data. Presenting on behalf of the HOPE study team, Jared Baeten (MTN) remarked that the ring data are similar to the oral PrEP OLE data-in those studies too, people were more adherent once they knew the results from prior trials. Final data from HOPE and DREAM, including findings on how well it works in those who use it consistently, will be available in late 2018/early 2019.

What’s Next

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is reviewing available data on the ring under a framework that allows it to provide regulatory guidance for developing countries. Its decision is expected in late 2018. Will the world be ready with investments, introduction plans and advocacy? Experience to date says: only if advocates work at local, regional and global levels to demand advance planning and action.

Women’s Vaginas: They’re amazing and important to HIV (duh!)

A biome is a large naturally occurring group of plants or animals in a given habitat. The vaginal microbiome is the naturally occurring group of bacteria that live in women’s vaginas and-depending on the proportion of different bacteria present at a given time-keep us healthy or may make us uncomfortable or even put us at risk. The relationship between the vaginal microbiome and HIV acquisition has been a focus at several recent conferences. It was highlighted again in a plenary presentation at CROI.

Nichole Klatt (University of Washington) presented data on what happens when there is an imbalance between good and bad bacteria, a condition known as vaginal microbiome dysbiosis. When researchers looked at vaginal bacteria and different antiretrovirals in lab studies (in vitro), they found that microbiomes with an imbalance towards bad bacteria showed some degradation of topical tenofovir and dapivirine. In other words: it could be that women with such imbalances who are adherent to a vaginal microbicide or the dapivirine ring might still have lower levels of drug in their genital tissue than what is needed for adherence.

It’s incredibly important to understand how the microbiome impacts HIV risk and vaginal health, including the presence of topically applied ARV-based prevention. It’s also incredibly important to remember that these data do not say anything about how oral tenofovir-based PrEP works for women. Oral PrEP arrives in genital tract cells in completely different ways than topical PrEP. To date, data from the human trials of both oral PrEP and dapivirine ring haven’t shown any difference in effect in women with bacterial vaginosis, which is good news. Additional data will continue to shed light on this important and continuing story. And in the meantime, the take-home is still that oral PrEP works for women and that so far there has been no difference in levels of protection in the ring studies linked to dysbiosis.

What’s Next

Advocates need to be on the frontlines of explaining what these vaginal microbiome data do and don’t tell us. We can’t afford misinformation suggesting that oral PrEP doesn’t work in women. We also can’t afford to ignore the complexities of all bodies-female, male and trans-and how they impact prevention and treatment.

Pregnant and Post-Partum Women Need HIV Prevention

A presentation from Renee Heffron (University of Washington) provided more evidence that pregnant and post-partum women are at increased risk of HIV infection. She and colleagues analyzed data from two studies of over 2,700 serodifferent couples. They found that women who were pregnant or post-partum were 3-4 times more likely to acquire HIV. Implications for care and prevention include counseling, more testing, treatment for male partners and woman-controlled prevention options like oral PrEP.

What’s Next

2018 will see many discussions of pregnancy, contraceptives and HIV risk as the many stakeholders prepare for data from the ECHO trial. ECHO is looking at three different methods (DMPA, copper IUD and Jadelle implant) to see if any have an impact on women’s HIV risk. These data are an essential reminder that HIV risk is driven by many things-including pregnancy. Advocates need to push for PrEP in the ante- and post-natal context, contraceptive choice, programs that diagnose male partners and link them to effective ART-and more. Data and global and national guidelines on the use of oral PrEP (e.g., the WHO technical brief on preventing HIV during pregnancy and breastfeeding in the context of PrEP) and the dapivirine ring for pregnant and post-partum women are essential.

PrEP Use Increases but Disparities Persist

Access to PrEP was woven throughout the CROI program, as data on PrEP programs and use continues to accumulate. Findings from San Francisco and Australia both showed a significant uptick in PrEP use and reduced infections (primarily in men who have sex with men) but across both of the studies racial and ethnic disparities in access remained largely unchanged. A new analysis from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), also presented at CROI, found that two-thirds of those who could benefit from PrEP are African-American or Latino and yet prescriptions for these populations remain stubbornly low. Gaps in access were seen across racial groups but were most stark among non-white populations.

What’s Next

A continued fight for health equity as part of a broader social justice agenda in America-and around the world.

Undetectable=Untransmittable

In a meeting known for a focus on basic science, conversations about the Undetectable=Untransmittable campaign and its role in reducing stigma were frequent and welcomed. And for the first time there was a plenary session on mental health at which presenter Robert Remien (HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Columbia University) called for stepped up mental health services to achieve the 90-90-90 goals.

What’s Next

Advocates have consistently been at the frontlines of demanding a holistic approach to prevention and treatment—here’s more data to fuel the fight.

Products in the Pipeline

While there was an increased focus on implementation work this CROI, true to form the meeting also featured plenty on data from early-stage research. Among the hundreds of posters and oral abstract presentations a couple stood out including a non-ARV vaginal insert-designed to prevent HIV, HSV-2 and HPV infection-from PopCouncil and the long-acting ARV from Merck (MK-8591) to prevent HIV. Given favorable animal data, both products are being considered for clinical development.

What’s Next

A major scientific-literacy and agenda-setting push so that advocates can join researchers and product developers to guide decisions about how these trials will be designed and when and where they will happen.

Keep the Conversation Going

Join us for a post-CROI webinar series! Dig into the data with researchers and discuss with fellow advocates how these findings can inform our advocacy work moving forward. Register today!

And stay tuned for announcements on additional webinars!

Insight to Impact: Demand Creation Challenge

The Insight to Impact: Demand Creation Challenge is dedicated to awarding innovative, disruptive, and compelling HIV prevention communications campaigns.

Campaigns may include short- and long-term communications programs and interventions, interpersonal communications, and mass media communications, including print, digital, and social media materials, developed to promote HIV prevention products, behaviors, or services.

Finalists will be showcased and winners will be announced at the AIDS 2018 pre-conference event, “Insight to Impact,” hosted by the OPTIONS Consortium on July 21, 2018.

Click here for more information.

Tracking the Fast-Changing Status of PrEP Around the World

A few weeks ago, South Korea became the latest country to introduce oral PrEP, bringing the number of countries offering PrEP to more than 50. With more people using PrEP every month, AVAC and its HIV Prevention Market Manager project has created the Global PrEP Tracker to help keep track of the fast-changing status of PrEP around the world.

The tracker, housed on the PrEP Watch online clearinghouse, is a single source offering a variety of information, including:

  • Estimated PrEP initiations compared to targets by country.
  • Specifics on PrEP programs by population, service delivery model and funder.
  • Status updates on country registration of tenofovir-based medications for prevention.
  • Up-to-date information on daily oral PrEP inclusion in national policy guidelines.

The tracker provides a global snapshot of PrEP statistics by country. PrEP Watch also houses Country Update Pages, which provide an overview of the status of daily oral PrEP in countries where PrEP is rolling out or being considered.

The numbers provided in the Global PrEP Tracker are estimates, as monitoring systems vary by country and are in early stages. Right now, the estimate is of individuals initiated on PrEP in ongoing projects. The tracker does not estimate the number of people actively taking PrEP at a given moment.

Updated quarterly, the estimates in PrEP Watch are derived by review of and outreach to implementers of oral PrEP studies, implementation initiatives and large-scale national programs. AVAC is grateful to the projects who contribute their data–these contributions make the tracker possible! If you notice data are missing, please let us know.

We hope this resource will bring some clarity to the fast-moving field of oral PrEP–and we look forward to working together to continue to improve the tracker in the future!

Three Perspectives on Two Big HIV Prevention Trials in Latest Px Pulse Podcast

The February episode of the Px Pulse podcast is up and brings you three perspectives on two recently launched major trials in HIV prevention: HPTN 084 testing a long-acting injectable antiretroviral called cabotegravir and HVTN 705/HPX 2008 testing a “mosaic” vaccine.

  • What opportunities stand out in an advocate’s eyes as these trials enroll?
  • What’s a mosaic vaccine?
  • What’s the status of ethical standards at trial sites?

Explore these issues and more in this episode of Px Pulse, AVAC’s podcast on HIV prevention research today.

You’ll hear from Malawi’s veteran advocate Maureen Luba, Zimbabwe-based bioethicist Paul Ndebele and leading scientist Dan Barouch.

In a hurry? Select among the podcast highlights.

And don’t forget to tell us what you think!

New Px Wire — 2018: Countdowns and counting what matters

The first issue of AVAC’s quarterly newsletter for 2018 is here! It’s designed to help you mark your calendars and make your advocacy plans for critical events in the next 12 months. These include:

  • The upcoming country deadlines for creating roadmaps to implement the priorities laid out by the UNAIDS’ Global Prevention Coalition. This work is supposed to jump-start primary prevention and bring down the rate of new diagnoses by 75 percent by 2020. Will it? Only if you get involved!
  • In the coming weeks, PEPFAR and many stakeholders will gather to develop targets, service delivery approaches and comprehensive plans for testing, prevention, treatment and virologic suppression in PEPFAR countries. It’s a key process for civil society to track. Find out how!
  • In 2019, the ECHO trial is expected to release its results on whether three different contraceptive methods impact women’s risk of HIV—but preparation for these trial results is starting now! Get involved!
  • Seven major efficacy trials of biomedical prevention tools are currently underway—read on to find out where, what and how to learn more.

This issue of Px Wire also includes a detailed infographic showing the status of oral PrEP rollout in the countries where trial sites are located. And don’t miss the infographic explaining the demographics of Africa’s “youth bulge” and its implications for the global response.

Find the full issue of Px Wire and the archive of past issues at www.avac.org/pxwire.

Announcing the 2018 AVAC Advocacy Fellows

AVAC is delighted to announce the 2018 AVAC Advocacy Fellows—the ninth class of Fellows! Please join us in congratulating these seven talented advocates.

The 2018 Advocacy Fellows were selected from a pool of over 125 applicants from over 26 countries across the globe. We thank all of the applicants and their proposed host organizations for the time and effort put into this process. We’re also grateful to the independent review committee of advocates, scientists and former Fellows and Hosts who guided our decision-making.

The 2018 Advocacy Fellows are:

The 2018 Fellows’ year begins in April against a backdrop of promise and challenge. Long-acting injectable PrEP and vaccines are both in large-scale trials. Rates of new HIV diagnoses are falling in some places, and not in others. Key primary interventions, like VMMC, compete for funding in the context of finite country budgets; as does programming for newer strategies, like PrEP.

The 2018 Fellows join a fantastic group of 56 current Advocacy Fellows and Alumni from eight sub-Saharan African countries and China who have participated in the program since its inception in 2010. Please visit the Advocacy Fellows page to learn more about the new Fellows’ planned work for the year. We hope you’ll find ways to collaborate with them in 2018 and beyond.

A Call for Applications for the 2019 Fellows Program will be announced this June with an application deadline in August. If you would like to be notified of the 2019 Call for Applications or have any questions, please email us at [email protected].

Did the South African Government Waste R127 Million on a Condom No One Wanted?

Johannesburg’s Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalism has published this article by Tian Johnson on how South Africa can make smart investments in the female condom. Read on for details on the difference demand creation and counseling can make.

Real Women Don’t Look Like Models: What the latest paper on hormonal contraception and HIV risk leaves out

Emily Bass is AVAC’s Director of Strategy & Content.

The incomparable activist and writer Kenyon Farrow used to write a blog called Non-Shock of the Week, and it came to mind when I read yet another analysis of the interplay between hormonal contraception (HC), HIV, and the long-term impact on women’s health in Africa.

This paper, published by the journal Global Health: Science and Practice, uses models to explore what would happen if the injectable contraceptive DMPA, or Depo-Provera, was withdrawn from the parts of the world where it is most widely used.

Why ask this question? Because there is a possibility that DMPA (and other injectable contraceptives that contain the same synthetic hormone) could increase women’s risk of HIV. The World Health Organization (WHO) identifies this “theoretical or possible risk” in its current classification of three products: DMPA, NET-EN (another injectable that uses a different hormone from DMPA) and DMPA-SC, also known as Sayana Press, which is the same hormone as Depo but uses a different, simpler delivery method. (More background information is available here.)

DMPA is the mostly widely used contraceptive in East and Southern Africa, so my non-shock of the week was its key finding: Taking away DMPA without offering a comparable method would increase women’s risk of dying from pregnancy-related outcomes (e.g., unsafe abortions, complications from pregnancy), and that more women would die than would be protected from HIV.

Well, yes. That’s not news. Various models have drawn the same conclusion, and an updated systematic review of epidemiological evidence on hormonal contraceptive methods and HIV acquisition was published in 2016. At least one of the authors of the recent analysis knows this, having participated in forums where civil society have implored “experts” to stop promoting these false choices. No responsible funder, government, activist or advocate would ever suggest that DMPA should be pulled off the shelf without a replacement. Maternal mortality claims too many lives; contraceptives are essential; and DMPA is the right one for many women.

So why do we keep on being told how bad it would be if DMPA were to vanish, in the event it turns out to increase women’s risk of HIV? A cynical analysis is that these publications are preparing the ground in advance of data due in 2019 from the ECHO trial, which is expected to yield an answer to these questions. (ECHO is measuring whether DMPA administered through an intramuscular injection (IM) and two other HC methods-the Jadelle implant and the non-hormonal copper intrauterine device (IUD)-impact women’s risk of HIV.)

The ECHO trial is designed to provide clarity where there hasn’t been any-by using a randomized clinical trial design that aims to eliminate the potential for bias, which could be influencing observational data available thus far. If DMPA does increase women’s risk of HIV, there will be an imperative to change the status quo and do things that are costly, hard and largely avoided by many countries for many years. Things like: increasing the number of choices that women have for contraception; integrating HIV prevention and contraceptive provision services into one clinic; and providing oral PrEP as part of comprehensive HIV prevention options.

Does this sound far-fetched? Consider this:

The article concludes, “In countries with the highest maternal mortality rates, an unrealistically large proportion of the women would need to transition from progestin-only injectables to another effective method in order to reach net neutral mortality thresholds.” (Emphasis added)

In fact, the authors found (except in South Africa) 80 to 90 percent of women now using DMPA would need to switch to something just as effective to net more lives saved than lost. This calculation seems to be borne out by the available facts, but it also puts the problem in a vacuum. If a contraceptive method impacts a woman’s HIV risk she should be given the option to switch methods; she should be provided the means to make different choices about HIV prevention.

The modeling paper could have suggested that now is a moment to intensify efforts to give African women access to oral PrEP along with other methods of HIV prevention-at the same places where they choose their contraceptives. This has been the refrain of advocates working on this issue all along: Women must be able to protect themselves from HIV and access safe and effective contraception. There is no time for programs or modeling papers that, however inadvertently, put forward a false dichotomy between women’s HIV prevention needs and their contraceptive needs.

Instead of issuing papers and arguments about how hard and risky it will be to change anything if ECHO does indeed find that a given method impacts risk, global and national decision makers need to send the message: This is an opportunity to advance women’s health via integration of HIV prevention and contraceptive programs and expanding the method mix of both. There’s consistent evidence that women want this and that it’s good for individual and community health. So why not do it at scale now, irrespective of the ECHO trial? Send money with the message. Fill the shelves with options for women to choose from and provide counselors skilled in explaining the risks and benefits of different methods. This is not impossible.

Another article published recently, which sits behind a paywall, looked at possible explanations for why DMPA might increase women’s risk of HIV. It’s dense, but the bottom line is that the specific progestin in DMPA acts differently than other progestins. Some of those differences could increase women’s risk of HIV. It’s all inference-there’s no direct measurements of DMPA use and HIV risk. The authors looked at the available data: different kinds of cells, immune substances, other markers that the body produces and how DMPA affects them. The authors say that there could be a rational explanation for why DMPA may increase women’s risk and other methods don’t. But their research doesn’t supply an answer, just more information in a murky space that might-or might not-be cleared up by the ECHO result.

In the meantime:

  • WHO should clarify their course of action if the ECHO study shows that DMPA does impact HIV risk, including how they will engage stakeholders and convene a guidelines review. WHO should contribute further models, other literature and resources that will lead to clear communication and policy guidance.
  • All stakeholders working in both HIV and reproductive health need to plan, ideally together and not in silos, now for the range of potential results from the ECHO trial.
  • Programs, policies and messages need to be developed and evaluated to understand how best to honor and uphold women’s right to know all available information on the contraceptive method(s) they are being offered.
  • Investment is needed now in programs that provide women with broader choices in contraception and HIV prevention.
  • Ongoing engagement with women affected by these issues is essential. Their perspectives and experiences must guide policy, programs and messaging.

Additional Information

The January Episode of Px Pulse is Up!

As the new year gets into full swing, we at AVAC look forward to assessing, untangling, confronting and calling on all of us to commit to HIV prevention in all its complexity. Building on the advocacy agenda we lay out in AVAC Report 2017, and a corresponding December episode of our Px Pulse podcast, our January episode expands on what we’re looking forward to in the year ahead.

Find Px Pulse on iTunes or listen at AVAC.org to hear AVAC Executive Director Mitchell Warren explore more of what’s got our attention—it’s no small list.

  • Major new vaccine and long-acting injectable PrEP trials are launching.
  • The dapivirine ring is under regulatory review, and could be the world’s next biomedical prevention option since oral PrEP.
  • Recent findings from the Rakai Community Cohort Study in Uganda confirmed what models predicted—bringing combinations of existing interventions, such as voluntary medical male circumcision and antiretroviral treatment, to scale slashes new HIV diagnoses. How can we leverage these findings to maximize prevention at the global level?
  • What will advocates need to do this year to prepare for results—anticipated in 2019—of a key trial called ECHO that’s looking at whether contraceptive methods affect HIV risk?

Hear all this and more in the January episode of Px Pulse, AVAC’s podcast on HIV prevention research today. Tell us what you think!