Press Release

Declining Funding and Shrinking Donor Base Imperils Continued Success of HIV Prevention Research; European Countries Called to Renew Support

Contacts

AVAC: Kay Marshall, kay@avac.org, +1-347-249-6375
IAVI: Rose Catlos, rcatlos@iavi.org, +1-212-847-1049

New York and Paris —

A new report released today ahead of the 9th IAS Conference on HIV Science documents 2016 funding and highlights a continuing trend of flat or declining funding and its potential impact on further innovation in HIV prevention research and development (R&D).

The Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group’s (RTWG) 13th annual report, HIV Prevention Research & Development Investments, 2016: Investment priorities to fund innovation in a challenging global health landscape, documents the lowest annual investment in HIV prevention R&D in more than a decade. In 2016, funding for HIV prevention R&D decreased by three percent (US$35 million) from the previous year, falling to US$1.17 billion.

At a time when the field is moving towards a new slate of efficacy trials across the prevention pipeline and follow-on research for successful antiretroviral-based prevention options is underway or planned this trend is worrisome, particularly in light of uncertainties around the sustainability of public sector support from the US and other funders. Even small declines in funding can delay or sideline promising new HIV prevention options that are needed to end the HIV epidemic.

The US continued to be the major funder of HIV prevention research. In fact, 88 cents of every dollar spent on HIV prevention R&D in 2016, came from just two donors: the US public sector and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. In contrast, European public sector funding fell by US$10 million from 2015, and at US$59 million, accounted for just six percent of all public sector investment. This is the lowest European funding recorded in the last decade and marks a 52 percent decrease from the peak funding (US$124 million) in 2009. In addition, the number of philanthropic donors fell sharply from a total of 27 in 2015 to just 12 in 2016.

The RTWG renewed a call for a greater range of donors to increase the stability of R&D financing and cushion potential impact if any of the major funders were to reduce their investments. Noting increases in public sector funding from the Netherlands and Sweden, the RTWG called on other European countries to increase investment in critical HIV prevention tools to help end the epidemic.

The past year has seen one new HIV vaccine efficacy trial begin and another planned to begin later in 2017; a novel proof-of-concept trial of antibody-mediated prevention underway; a monthly vaginal ring with the antiretroviral (ARV) drug dapivirine proven effective and under review by the European Medicines Agency; a multipurpose technology combining dapivirine and a contraceptive has launched early-stage trials; a long-acting ARV-based injectable PrEP formulation is beginning efficacy trials; and, finally, daily oral PrEP delivery programs are being scaled up in multiple countries. And behind these more advanced R&D activities come many other different HIV prevention modalities poised to prove themselves in early-stage research.
“The latest figures from UNAIDS show us that there has been progress toward meeting the 90 90 90 treatment goals, but there has been less progress – and less reporting – on meeting the prevention goals that are critical to epidemic control,” said Mitchell Warren, AVAC executive director. “We need to not only vastly accelerate roll out of HIV treatment and existing prevention options, we need continued and sustained investment to keep HIV prevention research on track to provide the new tools that will move the world closer to ending AIDS.”

The RTWG has tracked more than US$17 billion in investment towards biomedical HIV prevention since 2000 and warned that the greatest impact of this investment could be lost without continued and sustained support to move promising prevention options from laboratories and clinics into the lives of those who most need them.

“We are at an incredibly exciting time in the field of HIV prevention research and development with more life saving innovations, science and technology coming to the forefront than ever before,” said Luiz Loures, Deputy Executive Director of UNAIDS. “We cannot allow a lack of funding to set back progress. Invest now and we can end AIDS by 2030.”

The report documents some critical increases in funding, including the highest annual investment in preventive HIV vaccines since 2007, which includes the highest investment by the US public sector in preventive vaccine research since 2000, in part because of the start of the first vaccine efficacy trial in almost a decade. Yet European public sector investment in vaccine research was the lowest since 2001. The increase in support for vaccine research comes at a critical time in vaccine R&D and is an example of funders responding to the need for investment to keep promising research moving forward. The RTWG noted this level of investment should be occurring across the field to support the broadest possible pipeline of promising new HIV prevention options.
“A true end to AIDS will only be possible if we can develop and deploy an effective HIV vaccine and other innovative biomedical products for HIV prevention” said Mark Feinberg, President and CEO of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI). “With growing risk of increasing rates of HIV infection due to demographic trends and incomplete reach of HIV treatment programs, advances being made in HIV R&D needs support and acceleration. Progress can only happen with sustained public and private sector investment in HIV prevention R&D.”

The HIV field comes together in Paris next week at IAS2017 at a time when there is both much to be optimistic about in HIV science and in the accumulated knowledge of what and how we need to deliver treatment, prevention and care to the people who need it most. Yet, as the title of the report notes, this optimism faces a volatile global health landscape. Funding constraints, policy changes, shifting donor priorities and shifting demographics will all play a role in the world’s ability to respond to the continued challenges that HIV presents.

“After years of prudent and increasingly high-impact investment in HIV prevention and treatment, we have seen amazing dividends in lives saved, families kept together, communities revitalized and economies boosted,” added Warren. “We cannot lose that momentum. We have the innovative science. Now we need an expanded cadre of innovative funders who will work with us to ensure a continued return on investment in more lives saved and more infections averted.”

The report and infographics on prevention research investment are online at www.hivresourcetracking.org and on social media with #HIVPxinvestment.

###

Since 2000, the Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group (formerly the HIV Vaccines & Microbicides Resource Tracking Working Group) has employed a comprehensive methodology to track trends in research and development (R&D) investments and expenditures for biomedical HIV prevention options. AVAC leads the secretariat of the Working Group, that also includes the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). This year’s report is additionally made possible by the support of several donors, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the American people through the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of AVAC and the Working Group and do not necessarily reflect the views of PEPFAR, USAID or the United States Government.

Px Wire January-March 2017, Vol. 10, No. 1

This issue of Px Wire, AVAC’s quarterly update on HIV prevention research, looks ahead at a host of issues we are watching in 2017. Are we confronting “Fast Track” goals with the sober analysis they demand? Will oral PrEP guidelines translate into programs and will programs meet people’s needs? What progress can we expect from studies on the dapivirine vaginal ring, various vaccine candidates or on broadly neutralizing antibodies, which are garnering so much press attention of late? Will global leaders embrace policies that ensure data gaps on key populations will finally be filled?

Px Wire’s Take on 2017: #Onwards #UntilTheEpidemicIsOver

2017 promises to be a year of big changes, but how the political winds will touch the field of HIV is still unknown. Amidst the uncertainty, long hard work advancing HIV prevention is pushing frontiers all over the world from the lab to the clinic to the household medicine cabinet.

This issue of Px Wire, AVAC’s quarterly update on HIV prevention research, looks ahead at a host of issues we are watching in 2017. Are we confronting “Fast Track” goals with the sober analysis they demand? Will oral PrEP guidelines translate into programs and will programs meet people’s needs? What progress can we expect from studies on the dapivirine vaginal ring, various vaccine candidates or on broadly neutralizing antibodies, which are garnering so much press attention of late? Will global leaders embrace policies that ensure data gaps on key populations will finally be filled?

Check out AVAC’s round-up of these and other questions that we think will define the state of HIV prevention in 2017. And this issue’s centerspread extends the story beyond 2017 with an infographic showing the status of large-scale prevention trials through 2020.

Who do you love? Finding treasure at the last day of R4P

Greetings from the last official day of R4P 2016! It’s been a week of conversations, presentations, celebrations and—sometimes—consternation. And yes, it’s been a lot of words. New terms, familiar ones and the occasional Greek character (we’re talking to you α4β7 integrin).

Speaking of ancient Greek and also words: did you know that “treasure” and “thesaurus” share a common Greek relative? Thesaurus originally meant storehouse and treasure. From that, it was borrowed for the usage current today: a storehouse of words.

However, at the end of any gathering of this dynamic, dedicated field, what becomes clear is that the treasures are not the words but the people. The friends, fighters, thought leaders who propel this work forward. For our final update from the final day of HIVR4P, we offer you a round-up of (inter)national treasures.

Treasure 1: The adolescent girls and young women of western Kenya

Yesterday morning Kawango Agot (IRDO) presented data from a study in western Kenya aimed at understanding who adolescent girls and young women are having sex with—and why. This work is part of Kenya’s DREAMS initiative. Supported by PEPFAR, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and private sector partners, DREAMS is a multi-country effort aimed at reducing incidence in adolescent girls and young women by 40 percent by 2017. Success depends on identifying and reaching those girls and women most likely to acquire HIV—and to understand how and why they are at such high risk. The data from Agot’s presentation may not be not the last word, but it is a stirring example of research that clarifies the lived realities of people who need HIV prevention.

Young women and adolescent girls reported having sex because they wanted chips (French fries) or because they wanted someone to give them a ride. They said that they had sex for money and for prayers, which they hoped would help them to pass exams. Fifteen- to nineteen-year-old girls who were in school but lacking one or both parents reported that their teachers were the only men with whom they sometimes used condoms. Every column and cell of Agot’s slide contained a world. It is a world we all have to work together to imagine differently. We start this effort by recognizing how invaluable, beloved and needed these adolescent girls and young women are. They are resilient, resourceful, forthright—and urgently deserving of a world where they wake every day to a reality that treasures their young lives.

Treasure 2: Young African men making the decision to get circumcised

Thursday brought insights into the decision-making paths that men in sub-Saharan Africa travel before undergoing voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC). Tremendous progress has been made in rolling out VMMC in priority countries in the region. Continued success depends on acting on the kind of information presented today. Karin Hatzold (PSI) presented market research conducted by IPSOS that helped generate an understanding of how men make the decision to undergo VMMC—and how long this decision takes. As Hatzold described, an average of two years and three months passes between the time that a man becomes aware of VMMC and decides to undergo the procedure. These and other data were used to inform a strategy to create demand in specific target groups of men in Zimbabwe.

Later that day, Bertran Auvert of the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) reported on a “short-time” intervention designed to increase uptake of VMMC in Orange Farm, South Africa. The site of the first randomized trial to show the impact of VMMC, Orange Farm had relatively stable prevalence of VMMC between 2010 and 2015. Since population-level impact depends on coverage, Auvert and colleagues designed a short, household-centered intervention and piloted it in 983 households in one site within Orange Farm. The intervention brought VMMC prevalence up from roughly 50 percent to 80 percent—a finding that supports further investigation of this approach. Why is coverage so important? John Stover (Avenir Health) gave a presentation on the estimated number of HIV infections averted by the rollout of VMMC in ten priority counties in Kenya. By 2015, over one million Kenyan men had undergone the procedure. Three different modeling groups calculated the number of infections averted—and all came to the same conclusion: by 2015 VMMC averted 5 percent of the HIV infections that would have happened in that period. Stover reported that the impact, and numbers of infections in both men and women that are averted by VMMC, only increases over time—a potent reminder of the need to pursue ambitious VMMC scale up as part of combination prevention.

None of this would be possible without the boys, young and adult men who undergo the procedure. It is a profound personal choice and one with tremendous impact on the effort to end AIDS. We treasure you.

Treasure 3: The CAPRISA 256 Antibody

“It’s a South African national treasure,” remarked a researcher to Penny Moore (University of the Witwatersrand) about CAP256, a broadly neutralizing antibody isolated from a South African living with HIV. Moore—who is an absolute treasure of lucid, engaging and enthusiastic information about all things antibody—described new insights into how CAP256 can show us how broadly neutralizing antibodies develop. We won’t seek to replicate her explanation in detail—check R4P for the webcast—but it appears that CAP256 is elicited by a rare group of HIV viruses that have holes in the sugary glycan shield that makes up most of the virus’s outer covering concealing key parts of the viral anatomy. (Antibodies emerge or are elicited by the parts of the virus that the immune system is able to “see”. The antibody then binds to that specific part of the virus. Many antibodies bind to HIV without impeding it. But some antibodies target hidden regions of HIV that may only be exposed for briefly when the virus is binding to a cell. These kinds of antibodies can neutralize and block HIV activity.)

Treasure 4: Omololu Falobi Award Winners

The fifth Omololu Falobi Award for Excellence in HIV Prevention Research Community Advocacy was presented as part of the closing. The award is given in memory of Nigerian activist Omololu Falobi. Falobi is remembered by friends and fellow advocates as a talented journalist, an activist for social justice, an advocate for prevention research and a son of Africa who worked tirelessly to ensure Africans were taking ownership of their own HIV care and prevention. Since 2008, the award has been presented in his memory as an ongoing legacy to recognize his commitment and lasting contributions to HIV prevention research advocacy, and to honor those who follow in his footsteps. In a break with tradition, on the 10th anniversary of Falobi’s passing, the honor goes not to an individual, but the prevention advocacy movement. The 2016 award celebrates 85 advocates from 19 countries, all nominated by their peers in the field. These advocates represent thousands who are part of the movement that has helped fuel the great progress the field has seen over the last decade. Profiles of the 85 honorees are available online at www.avac.org/falobi.

Treasure 5: Ward Cates

We probably would have started this list with Ward, a beloved and sorely missed friend, colleague, mentor and advocate who passed away earlier this year. But Ward would have argued to put young African women first—the way he always did in his work as a researcher dedicated to advancing the sexual and reproductive health rights of all women and girls. And then he would have told us that you can’t just talk about the women—that men matter too. And we agree, as the list reflects. And then he probably would have wanted us to highlight the work of a younger investigator emerging as a thought leader in the field. So we did that too. Not stopping there, Ward would surely have urged us to recognize the critical role of advocates in shaping the HIV response. And then, and only then, might he have allowed us to celebrate him, as two long-time colleagues and friends, Mike Cohen (UNC) and Helen Rees (WRH), both did in talks at the conference’s closing session. In a way, this whole list is for—and because—of you, Ward. You taught us who and what to treasure. We will always treasure you.

Check out all the webcasts online—and stay tuned for future updates as we unpack our bags and all the data and discussions from Chicago!

Debate This: What do HIV prevention and elections have in common?

In a baseball-obsessed town (see Monday’s round-up) there was competition for TV viewers last night in Chicago as millions of people, including many conference-goers, watched the third and final debate between the two candidates vying to become the next US President. What do political campaigns and HIV prevention have in common? Read on for our (non-partisan) thoughts!

Lesson One: Tell a story, make it personal.

Politicians, advocates and parents—these are all groups that know the power of storytelling. Wednesday’s plenary session featured Noël Gordon Jr. (Human Rights Campaign) who told his unique story of getting on PrEP. He also shared his observations from working with gay men and transgender women, he talked about how their attitude toward HIV prevention, the threats to uptake and what opportunities we have to succeed. In advocacy, the best stories are the ones that (re)connect people to the issues. Gordon showed statistics on who is using PrEP in America—and the racial, age and gender demographics of PrEP users do not match those of people most at risk. Stigma also remains a huge issue.

Also in this plenary session, and available via webcast: two excellent research updates—Dennis Burton (Scripps Research Institute) on broadly neutralizing antibody-based vaccine design and Sharon Hillier (Microbicide Trials Network) on the state of the microbicide field.

Later that morning in the Advocates’ Corner, four advocates—Chilufya Kasanda, current AVAC Fellow at the Treatment Advocacy and Literacy Campaign (Zambia), Chamunorwa Mashoko, a leader of the Advocacy Core Team in Zimbabwe, Morenike Upkong, founder and leader of the Nigerian HIV New HIV Vaccine and Microbicide Advocacy Society and Amaka Enemo, current AVAC Fellow at the Heartland Alliance in Nigeria—shared personal stories about empowerment, advocacy and being human. All participated in a training for advocates earlier this year conducted by The Moth, a US-based organization focused on the art and craft of storytelling. Check back at avac.org to see video from their stories later this year.

Lesson Two: Exercise choice, give consent, show zero tolerance for sexual violence.

Some of the story lines in the American election have been a potent reminder of the fundamental right that all people, women and men, have to exercise choice about their bodies. In her plenary, Sharon Hillier (MTN) showed data that underscored the importance of full, free choice. Among women under 21 in the ASPIRE trial of the dapivirine ring, overall use was very low. But among women in this age range who were invested in using it—indicated by the amount of dapivirine still remaining in used rings, drug levels in samples, and self-report—use levels were stronger. And when they did use it, they were protected. Hillier reported analysis from the ASPIRE data indicating that the ring, used consistently, reduced risk by up to 84 percent compared to women under 25 using a placebo ring. This information complemented findings, also from ASPIRE, presented by Thesla Palanee-Phillips (WHRI) at the Tuesday press conference (and on the conference program today) that found that intimate partner violence—which can be physical and psychological—impeded adherence among ASPIRE trial participants. In this election and prevention season, it bears repeating: no biomedical prevention strategy will eliminate the need to prevent and address sexual, psychological and physical violence against women, sexual minorities and all people under threat because of how they live or what they do.

Lesson Three: Look who’s talking (or being talked about).

Sometimes the candidate who seizes the spotlight is campaigning for the next election. HIV prevention, like American politics, can gravitate towards the next big thing, be it a vaccine candidate or a presidential hopeful. The relatively untested is also relatively untarnished—and it can inspire hope for major change. Much of the vaccine discussion was not on the candidates now in efficacy trials but rather on candidates in earlier phases of development. On Tuesday, Chris Parks (IAVI) discussed the results of a trial in non-human primates of a vaccine that uses Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) as a vector. VSV is a replicating vector: a virus that has been disabled so that it doesn’t cause disease or carry risk but does have the ability to copy itself. It is thought that replicating vectors could prompt strong and sustained immune responses.

Later on Tuesday, Hanneke Schuitemaker from Janssen said that a decision is expected as early as the 4th quarter of 2016 about whether to move forward with a three-part vaccine strategy known as Ad26/gp140/MVA, which is currently under development in collaboration with a number of organizations including the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN), International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI), the US Military HIV Research Program (USMHRP) and Beth Israel Deaconess Center.

Interest in next-generation candidates also showed up in discussions of long-acting antiretrovirals, which could be used for both treatment and prevention. Data were shown on a new compound known as EFdA, which is in early animal studies, and on cabotegravir, the candidate moving toward possible efficacy trials in 2017. Politics remind us—don’t discount or count on any single candidate to get the job done!

Lesson Four: Money talks.

At an afternoon session, we heard that money for HIV prevention R&D has remained essentially flat for over a decade. These data come from a new report, HIV Prevention Research & Development Investments, 2000–2015: Investment priorities to fund innovation in a challenging global health landscape, from the Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group, which AVAC leads. Read more on the new data in our blog post here.

Lesson Five: People in power can and must listen to and be guided by people “on the ground”.

Who are politicians or trial site staff responsible to—and dependent on—for success? The people in the communities in which they work. Without collaboration, there is no change. No engagement, no chance of making real progress. This is recognized across the field—and there’s expanding data on just how to engage. This contribution to the field is coming from widespread use of the Good Participatory Practice Guidelines (GPP) framework, which has been mentioned throughout the conference. In a presentation by Kenyan researcher Jane Ng’ang’a from the KAVI Institute of Clinical Research, she described how KAVI evaluated and improved its engagement plans using GPP. She credits the GPP framework for fostering community understanding and genuine support for the research. AVAC is proud to be the home of an online course on GPP—be sure to subscribe to the Advocates’ Network for announcements of when the next course will run.

When scientists work with (or as) advocates, or when politicians serve as (or team up with) activists, great things can happen. So one of our favorite moments of yesterday’s dialogues came at a “Meet the Experts Session”. Discussing their respective presentations, antibody expert Dennis Burton, and Noël Gordon, expert on the real world experience of people whose lives are affected by HIV in the US, realized they needed to connect. Business cards were exchanged—and perhaps the next prevention revolution was born.

For those on-site today, be sure to check out the final sessions at the Advocates’ Corner and grab some extra materials to take home! Thursday’s sessions include:

  • 10:00am – 10:30am: PrEP implementation in Chicago’s STI clinics
  • 12:00pm – 1:00pm: “It’s too complicated for them”: Service providers as gatekeepers to PrEP information and access

For the latest from the conference follow in real-time on Twitter and check out meeting coverage on aidsmap. The daily rapporteur summaries also provide report-backs on the conference. Missed a session? Visit here to see the webcasts as they become available.

Not To Be Missed: New report on funding for prevention research

The span of a decade—that interval that’s neither too long nor too short to bring innovation—is one that’s often used in the HIV prevention research space, usually to convey optimism. Back in 1997, then President Bill Clinton called for a national commitment to develop an AIDS vaccine within ten years. Just this week, Bill Gates said, “With the right leadership and investments over the next decade, we can discover and deliver a vaccine for HIV.”

The success of these forward-looking claims has always depended on sustained funding. Note, in both cases, the emphasis on commitment and leadership. No one is promising a vaccine with anything less. A look back at the last ten years provides a warning on this front. Released today, the Resource Tracking for HIV prevention R&D Working Group’s latest annual report on global investment into biomedical HIV prevention reports that overall funding for HIV prevention research and development (R&D) has remained essentially flat for over a decade.

Close followers of the annual “RT” report take note—a preliminary version was released at AIDS 2016 in Durban in July. The final version contains slightly updated data and the same overall messages: with a slight fall from US$1.25 billion in 2014 to US$1.20 billion in 2015, overall funding for HIV prevention research and development (R&D) has been more or less level for the past ten years.

And what a decade it’s been! Consider the developments in PrEP, the pipeline of injectable ARVs for prevention and treatment, the continued advance of the ARV-containing vaginal dapivirine ring, and the insights and advances that have come from sustained scientific inquiry related to the search for an HIV vaccine. These are exciting times. And the fact that all of this happened in the context of flat funding for research doesn’t mean that flat funding will get us where we need to go next. As Tom Hope, PhD (Northwestern University) stressed at an opening plenary of the HIV R4P conference where the report was launched, the fact that funding is declining concurrent with new discoveries is a major challenge for the field.

The report notes that preventive vaccine research funding constituted the bulk of all investments, followed by investments in microbicides, TasP, PMTCT, PrEP, VMMC and female condoms. With the exception of vaccines and female condoms, every other HIV prevention option tracked by the working group experienced a decline. These trends are somewhat reflective of the cyclical nature of large-scale clinical trials—when trials end, funding drops off. Likewise, as some interventions enter full scale rollout, like VMMC and TasP, research in this arena can be expected to slow down. Nevertheless, the overall trends bear close watching and strong advocacy to ensure that research continues.

The right products need to be tested in the populations who need them most. The report is also a powerful reminder that this isn’t necessarily how research works. It provides information on the demographic breakdown of almost 900,000 participants in ongoing HIV prevention trials in 2015, with the majority of these volunteers residing in sub-Saharan Africa, most notably Uganda, Kenya, and South Africa. Only one in eight trial participants in 2015 belonged to a population most affected by HIV, including MSM and transgender women, injection drug users, and cisgender women.

These sobering facts come in the context of a vigorous period in research and development. It’s a time of growing recognition from the global community that research has to be part of the long-term fight to end the HIV epidemic. Taking stock of all that’s been accomplished with ten years of flat funding, now is the time to support continued progress with additional, well-targeted resources.

The Resource Tracking Working Group hopes that this tool provides strong facts for advocacy and supports efforts to assess public policy and its role in accelerating scientific progress. We thank all of the individuals who contributed data to the report and who gave time and effort as trial participants.

Check out the report, share it with your fellow advocates, and be sure to let us know if your organization is either a funder or recipient of HIV prevention grants or if you have further questions or information about resource tracking at all!

Press Release

A Decade of Flat Funding Could Imperil Progress of the HIV Prevention Research Pipeline

Contacts

AVAC: Kay Marshall, kay@avac.org, +1-347-249-6375
IAVI: Arne Naeveke, anaeveke@iavi.org, +1-212-847-1055

A PDF version of this press release is also available.

Report released at HIV Research for Prevention Conference highlights funding trends, opportunities and challenges for HIV prevention R&D

Chicago – A new report released today at the second HIV Research for Prevention Conference in Chicago documents 2015 funding, highlighting a decade of flat funding and its potential impact on continued innovation in the HIV prevention research and development (R&D) field.

The Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group’s (RTWG) 12th annual report, HIV Prevention Research & Development Investments, 2000-2015 Investment priorities to fund innovation in a challenging global health landscape, finds that funding for R&D of new and emerging prevention options decreased slightly in 2015. This was due in part to decreases from the US public sector and a downswing in global philanthropic funding.

Steady progress in R&D for AIDS vaccines, microbicides, pre-exposure prophylaxis using antiretroviral drugs (PrEP) and treatment as prevention (TasP) confirms science’s critical role in providing solutions to end the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Yet research for these badly-needed solutions is in danger of being slowed or even sidelined by inadequate funding.

“It is critical that investments into HIV prevention innovations, science and technology are scaled up to put us firmly on the Fast-Track to ending AIDS by 2030,” said Luiz Loures, Deputy Executive Director, UNAIDS.

In 2015, funders invested a total of US $1.20 billion across R&D, down from US $1.25 billion in 2014, across eight key areas: preventive AIDS vaccines, microbicides, PrEP using antiretroviral drugs, TasP, HSV-2 vaccines and operations research related to voluntary medical male circumcision, female condoms and prevention of vertical transmission.

The report also finds that investment is being made along all phases of the research pipeline but remains concentrated among a few large investors. A more diverse base of funders would increase the stability of R&D financing and cushion the impact if any of the major funders were to reduce their investments. To improve continuity, RTWG calls for a more balanced funding base, especially through support of new investment by European and low- and middle-income countries. The US public sector (primarily via the National Institutes of Health) remained the largest global contributor at US$850 million, accounting for 70 percent of total funding. Together the US government and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the largest philanthropic funder, accounted for 81 percent of all funding in 2015.

“There is now very strong momentum in research and development, and we need to expedite the development of vaccine strategies and other new, biomedical prevention options that promise to be safe, accessible and effective for use throughout the world,” said Mark Feinberg, President and CEO of IAVI. “There must be adequate and sustained investment at all stages from early laboratory research and to clinical testing if we are to truly be able to contain the HIV pandemic and approach and end to AIDS.”

This is indeed a time of great optimism for HIV prevention research. Daily oral PrEP is gaining traction as a new prevention option in an increasing number of countries; an antiretroviral-based microbicide ring that showed modest efficacy earlier in 2016 will be further evaluated to determine its viability as a prevention option for women; large-scale efficacy trials of an AIDS vaccine candidate and an injectable form of PrEP are slated to begin soon and a novel proof-of-concept trial of antibody-mediated prevention is underway in several countries. Many more promising candidates in earlier stages are progressing toward pre-clinical and clinical evaluation.

Importantly, 2015 saw increasing investment in the science of delivery – or implementation research – primarily focused on delivery of TasP interventions. Such investments will become even more important to help ensure new prevention options move quickly and efficiently into prevention programs and begin to have an impact on HIV infection rates. There is also an increasing understanding that research must understand and integrate the needs and desires of people who will eventually use new prevention options. Ensuring that the perspective of those for whom new prevention options are being developed is included from the beginning of the research process can help ensure that safe and effective products can be rolled out swiftly and be more fully accepted.

“Innovative science needs innovative funding,” said Mitchell Warren, AVAC Executive Director. “We need an expanded and more diverse global cadre of funders who will be involved in and dedicated to advancing HIV prevention R&D, including product delivery. And these investments need to ensure that new options like daily oral PrEP, and potentially the dapivirine vaginal ring, do not sit on the shelf unused because we don’t know how to effectively deliver them, and that future R&D better meets the needs and wants of those for whom products are developed.”

The report and infographics on prevention research investment are online at www.hivresourcetracking.org and on social media with #HIVPxinvestment.

###

Since 2000, the Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group (formerly the HIV Vaccines & Microbicides Resource Tracking Working Group) has employed a comprehensive methodology to track trends in research and development (R&D) investments and expenditures for biomedical HIV prevention options. AVAC leads the secretariat of the Working Group, that also includes the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). This year’s report is additionally made possible by the support of several donors, including IAVI, UNAIDS, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the American people through the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of AVAC and the Working Group and do not necessarily reflect the views of PEPFAR, USAID or the United States Government.

Trial Participants by Prevention Research Area, 2015

Given the higher rates of acquisition seen across so-called key populations—members of highly burdened and underserved groups—it is critical to provide access to the research process such that they can participate and reap more immediate benefit of scientific progress. Greater efforts must be made to include key populations in this crucial process for the HIV prevention response to be truly impactful.

Global HIV Prevention R&D Investments by Technology, 2000-2015

In 2015, global funding for HIV prevention R&D declined slightly, from US $1.25 billion in 2014 to US $1.20 billion in 2015. This continues a decade of roughly flat funding. The US public sector remained the largest global contributor at US $850 million, and together with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the largest philanthropic funder, constituted 81 percent of all funding.

Durban 2016 Scorecard—How did it deliver?

Excerpted from Px Wire, this is a scorecard for the 2016 International AIDS Conference. Did it deliver?