A resource to support advocacy for multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs). The Guide calls out four areas ripe for advocate involvement. It also provides a snapshot on the status of MPT research and development and data on investments—critical information that can support evidence-based advocacy.
Advocates’ Guide to Multipurpose Prevention Technologies
New Resources on AVAC.org!
Read on for a roundup of new resources on AVAC.org and PrEPWatch.org!
It’s one year into the COVID-19 pandemic, and the pace of advocacy for many people has only accelerated. In this time, when vast quantities of information—good and bad—must be sorted and priorities set, AVAC has been generating resources to help you keep up-to-date and to inform your advocacy.
HIVR4P in 3D
Okay, maybe it’s not really three dimensions; it’s more! Catch up on many angles of R4P starting with AVAC’s coverage:
- Making Do With “Good Enough”: A roundup of the first week of HIVR4P
- Prevention Unmasked: A roundup from week two
Recordings from the Advocates’ Corner went deep into the content and include insightful, lively exchanges:
- Understanding Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies
- COVID-19 & Vaccine Hesitancy
- Tracking Global PrEP Use and Trends
- A Conversation About Multipurpose Prevention
- What Does the CAB-LA Tail Mean for Implementation?
- Research Ethics—New Guidelines, Same Urgency
- A Review of the Pregnancy and Breastfeeding Women’s HIV Prevention Pipeline
- A Look at the 2021 Resource Tracking Report
- A Conversation About the Dapivirine Ring: What do the WHO Guidelines Mean for Access?
- Working with the Global Infrastructure: A Conversation with the COVID-19 Advocates Advisory Board
Funding for HIV Prevention R&D
The 16th annual analysis of funding trends in HIV Prevention R&D is out with 2019 data, and it can all be found on a newly launched website: www.hivresourcetracking.org. The annual report is a collaboration among AVAC, IAVI and UNAIDS, and the website includes 20 years of funding trends.
1 Million PrEP Initiations…almost
These two resources will help you understand the trends in PrEP uptake, and keep you up-to-date on PrEP initiations around the world, which is fast approaching 1 million but still well below global targets.
- AVAC’s PrEP Tracker (Updated December 2020)
- The Evolution of Oral PrEP Access: Tracking trends in global oral PrEP use over time (presented at HIVR4P)
Ending TB
AVAC, Partners in Health, Friends of the Global Fight, Results, Treatment Action Group (TAG) and the Zero TB Initiative collaborated on a report and a new website that includes case studies from around the world. Find out what successful programs in Cambodia, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Russia, South Africa and the United States have in common and learn more about the critical components needed to achieve the eradication of TB.
- How Can We End The Tuberculosis Epidemic?
- This report builds on the Translating Progress into Success to End the AIDS Epidemic report from AVAC, Friends and amfAR.
Protecting Global Gains
Two new vignettes on Protecting Global Gains explore how communities are adapting to maintain critical healthcare as COVID-19 threatens hard-won gains in global health. This project is a collaboration including AVAC, Partners in Health, Friends of the Global Fight, Results, Treatment Action Group (TAG) and the Zero TB Initiative.
AVAC’s “3D” View of the World: 2019 and beyond
This infographic lays out AVAC’s top-line recommendations from AVAC Report 2019: Now What? The recommendations fall into three categories: deliver — prevention programs whose impact is well-measured and -defined; demonstrate — next-generation engagement for next-generation trials; develop — new targets for the post-2020 world.
AVAC Report 2019: With 2020 targets sure to be missed, we ask Now What?
Today, AVAC released Now What?, our 2019 annual report on the state of the HIV prevention field. Each year, the AVAC Report frames the most pressing advocacy issues facing the HIV response. At the threshold of 2020, it’s clear that global goals for HIV prevention will miss the mark by a long shot.
Though important progress has been made, the crisis UNAIDS called out in 2016 persists today with new infections around 1.7 million annually, a far cry from the 2020 target of fewer than 500,000.
So, we asked ourselves, Now What?, and answered with cross-cutting analysis and an advocacy agenda to match.
- Visit the Now What? website
- Download AVAC Report 2019: Now What?
- Download infographics from the Report
FIRST, we call for leadership that is bold, visible and activist, from the new head of UNAIDS, to houses of parliament to civil society coalitions: take uncompromising stances, demand accountability, speak out for intersectional issues of race, gender, class and climate. This work needs to be funded, full-throttle and fearless.
SECOND, we call for the use of today’s most recent evidence to guide new prevention targets that will pave the way for epidemic control. Clear milestones for the prevention research pipeline must be set. Investments over the past decades have provided us with the prevention options we have today, and much-needed new strategies are under now investigation. The field needs targets for prevention research that people can understand and influence.
THIRD, we call for multilayered prevention approaches that are centered around the person, not the virus. Since last World AIDS Day, we’ve learned again, perhaps most strikingly from the ECHO trial, about the dynamic needs of women for HIV and pregnancy prevention. The complexity of translating results into policy, bring renewed urgency to the need for comprehensive HIV prevention and reproductive health approaches. Multilayered prevention incorporates multipurpose strategies (i.e., products that prevent both pregnancy and HIV) within programs designed to address structural barriers (i.e., policy reform, transforming community norms, facilitating educational empowerment).
2020 will be a pivotal year—join us in calling on leaders, from the grassroots to global capitals, to make 2020 a turning point, when siloes come down, crises are transformed by innovation, and prevention is center stage in the fight against HIV.
Happy reading, and we’d love to hear how you answer Now What?
What’s New on AVAC.org and PrEPWatch.org
We don’t want you to miss a host of resources posted in recent weeks on AVAC.org and PrEPWatch. In case you missed them, these tools and resources will sharpen your take on the field.
Reporting on Global HIV Prevention
Check out these reports—recently published by AVAC and partners—for updates on funding trends in prevention and cure R&D, as well as a fresh look at places that have beaten back HIV with existing interventions:
- Translating Progress into Success to End the AIDS Epidemic offers an analysis of the interventions that succeeded in reducing HIV diagnoses and AIDS-related deaths in six places around world. The response in each location was tailored to its context and epidemic, but there are common elements that can be adapted anywhere.
- HIV Prevention Research & Development Investments: Investing to end the epidemic reports on overall 2018 investment in HIV prevention R&D and looks at funding trends. Findings include: 1.2 percent increased investment after five consecutive years of decline, investment in PrEP, female condoms and prevention of vertical transmission saw increases, while investment in voluntary medical male circumcision, preventive vaccines, microbicides, and treatment as prevention lost ground.
- Global Investment in HIV Cure Research and Development in 2018 estimates total funding for HIV cure-related research and looks at the drivers behind a 12 percent increase from 2017 to 2018.
Smarter Rollout
These articles and tools support advocates, implementers and decision-makers working on PrEP rollout today with an eye on future interventions tomorrow:
- Reaching and Targeting More Effectivley: The application of market segmentation to improve HIV prevention programmes, by AVAC’s Anabel Gomez and others, and published in the Journal of the International AIDS Society, explores how to leverage the power of market segmentation for the promotion and uptake of primary prevention.
- Just updated in July, AVAC’s Global PrEP Tracker on PrEPWatch.org provides the latest data on programs, number of enrollments by country, regulatory status and more.
- A User’s Guide to PrEP Tools offers a handy table to navigate the many tools produced by different organizations to support policy makers, implementers, providers and others on PrEP access, uptake and continuation. Use this table to learn more about these tools, who they’re designed for, and when to use them.
- The PrEP4Youth video series of public service announcements encourages adolescent girls and young women in South Africa to consider PrEP as an HIV prevention method. Created by the OPTIONS Consortium in collaboration with the South African National Department of Health, these videos feature popular actresses and put young women at the center with short empowering messages.
Apply to be an AVAC Fellow in 2020
AVAC would like to remind you that our call for applications for the 2020 class of AVAC Fellows is open until September 20. We encourage you to learn more about the program and share this information with your network!
Global HIV Prevention R&D Investment by Technology Category, 2000-2017
In 2017, reported funding for HIV prevention R&D decreased by 3.5 percent (US$40 million) from the previous year, falling to US$1.13 billion. The full report, HIV Prevention Research & Development Investments 2017: Investing to end the epidemic, is available for download. And all the graphics are available as well.
Press Release
Continued declines in HIV research funding put global prevention targets at great risk
Contacts
AVAC: Kay Marshall, kay@avac.org, +1-347-249-6375
IAVI: Anita Kawatra, akawatra@iavi.org, +1 212-847-1055
Madrid – HIV prevention research funding continued to decline in 2017 for the fifth consecutive year, driven largely by a five-year low in US public sector funding, according to a report released today at the HIV Research for Prevention (HIVR4P 2018) conference in Madrid, Spain.
The Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group’s 14th annual report, Investing to End the Epidemic, documents funding that fell to the lowest level in more than a decade: In 2017, funding for HIV prevention research and development (R&D) decreased by 3.5 percent (US$40 million) from the previous year, falling to US$1.13 billion.
This declining funding comes at a time of great optimism for research, with a slate of efficacy trials across the prevention pipeline – including major HIV vaccine, passive antibody and next generation PrEP efficacy trials – and critical follow-on research for proven antiretroviral-based prevention options, notably the dapivirine vaginal ring. But it also comes a time when the broader HIV field is grappling with a prevention crisis that is exacerbated by decreased funding for the overall HIV response and a lack of political will to adequately fund a response that will ensure the world meets the ambitious prevention targets to end the epidemic.
The Working Group warns that getting to zero new infections will not only require the expansion of existing options like voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but also the development of innovative new products, including long-acting, antiretroviral-based prevention options and a vaccine. Sustained funding is critical to keep the full gamut of HIV prevention research moving forward in a timely manner. Even small declines in funding can delay or sideline promising, new HIV prevention options that are needed to end the HIV epidemic.
“Make no mistake. We are in a prevention crisis and we cannot afford a further funding crisis,” said Mitchell Warren, AVAC executive director. “It is unacceptable that donor funding for HIV prevention research continues to fall year after year even as research is moving new options closer to reality. We need continued and sustained investment to keep HIV prevention research on track to provide the additional tools that are required for sustainable, durable control of the HIV epidemic.”
The US government continued to be the major funder of HIV prevention research, contributing almost three-fourths of overall funding. A decrease of almost six percent, though, brought funding to a five-year low of US$830 million. The Working Group noted that sharp declines in US government funding have a major impact on the biomedical HIV prevention R&D field. With uncertainty around continued political will to fund the HIV response, this trend is extremely worrying.
Together, the US public sector and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) represented 87 percent of the total global investment in 2017, an imbalance that has continued for several years. The Working Group in this year’s report cautioned against the disproportionate impact of shifting donor priorities by these two donors on cutting-edge research, noting that a US$50 million decrease in vaccine R&D in 2017 was largely attributed to cuts from the US government, while a 67 percent increase in VMMC funding in 2017 is due largely to enhanced investment from BMGF. The Working Group renewed a call to diversify the funding base to ensure both the sustainability of the field and that decades of gains made in scientific innovation are not lost to fluctuating investment.
The Working Group noted with concern that funding by the European Commission (EC) dropped by almost half from 2016 to 2017 (US$14.4 million in 2016 to US$7.6 million). Noting increases in public sector funding from Canada, Brazil and the Netherlands, the Working Group called on other European countries to increase investment in critical HIV prevention tools to help end the epidemic and to offset the drop in EC funding.
“A true end to AIDS will only be possible if we can develop and deploy an effective, accessible HIV vaccine and other biomedical innovations to prevent HIV infection,” said Mark Feinberg, M.D., Ph.D., President and CEO of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. “Decades of research are paying off with the most exciting advances we’ve seen to date. But progress can only continue with sustained public and private sector investment in HIV prevention R&D.”
As researchers, implementers, advocates and funders gather this week in Madrid to review progress in HIV prevention research, there is much to be optimistic about in HIV science and in the accumulated knowledge of how to end the epidemic. At the same time, sobering changes in the funding and policy environment could imperil future progress and wipe out the progress made. Funding constraints, policy changes, shifting donor priorities and shifting demographics will all play a role in the world’s ability to respond to the continued challenges that HIV presents.
“With 5000 people becoming infected with HIV every day it is critical that we both scale up the effective HIV prevention programmes we currently have and invest in new technologies and solutions so that they can become a reality for the populations most affected by HIV,” said Tim Martineau, Deputy Executive Director, Programme a.i. UNAIDS. “Doing both will avert new infections, save lives and reduce the rising costs of life-long antiretroviral treatment.”
The report and infographics on prevention research investment are online at www.hivresourcetracking.org and on social media with #HIVPxinvestment.
###
Since 2000, the Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group (formerly the HIV Vaccines & Microbicides Resource Tracking Working Group) has employed a comprehensive methodology to track trends in research and development (R&D) investments and expenditures for biomedical HIV prevention options. AVAC leads the secretariat of the Working Group, that also includes the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). This year’s report is additionally made possible by the support of several donors, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the American people through the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of AVAC and the Working Group and do not necessarily reflect the views of PEPFAR, USAID or the United States Government. AVAC does not accept funding from the pharmaceutical industry.
Putting Women at the Center: Informed choice in 2018 and beyond
We need to give women the choice to use DTG or not and to use contraception if indicated and desired. We need to support choices across options, with risk reduction—not use of a specific product—as the primary outcome. We need to give women the choice to use DMPA-IM or –SC or not, and to use HIV prevention as desired.
MPT Field Investments & Collaborations are Assets for Global Sexual Health
This post first appeared on the Initiative for MPTs’ blog.
Recently, on World Sexual Health Day, we at the IMPT reflect on how to work with partners to improve sexual health across the globe. There are many things that could be done, many different approaches, and many people we can work with towards this goal. Here, at the IMPT, we see multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) to be one such promising strategy with the potential to improve the sexual health – and lives – of women and their families across the globe.
Sexual and reproductive health risks, such as unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, are intrinsically interlinked. Yet, the current mix of prevention options has fallen short in protecting the sexual health of millions of women. The innovative work being done to advance prevention science, including the development of MPTs, is essential to better meet sexual health needs and improve countless lives. The price of innovation is steep and the time horizon is long, but the end result has the potential to be game changing.
Sustained investment in prevention science is crucial for both the roll-out of existing prevention methods, as well as the development of new and effective technologies, like MPTs. The IMPT, led by the IMPT Secretariat, has partnered with the Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group to monitor investments that support MPTs and the wider field of HIV prevention on an annual basis.
Since its inception in 2004, the Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group, hereby referred to as the Working Group, has tracked US$17 billion of investments in biomedical HIV prevention research and analyzed funding trends across various prevention technologies, research stages, and sectors. This multi-tiered analysis of global investment flows is crucial for evaluating public policies, improving transparency, and furnishing facts for advocacy. As the HIV prevention toolbox has expanded, so has the mandate of the Working Group and the scope of our resource tracking efforts.
Substantial growth of the MPT pipeline coupled with an ever-present concern about the risk of STIs and unintended pregnancy in women, heralded the beginning of a partnership between the IMPT and the Working Group. From 2013 onwards, in a unique collaboration defined by a shared commitment to prevention science, knowledge and data-sharing, the IMPT and the Working Group have collated and analyzed close to US$142 million in funding for the advancement of MPT products. Expanding the scope of the Working Group’s original mandate, grants relevant to MPT R&D are also collected during the annual outreach to funders and implementers of HIV prevention science. This engenders a more efficient and streamlined method for data collection and the monitoring of field-wide investment trends.
Funding trends for MPT R&D reflect the rapid pace with which the field has grown – to cover two dozen new products and a 52 percent increase from 2013 levels when the resource tracking partnership began. While annual investments have averaged at US$37 million, overall funding dropped for the first time in 2016 by 14 percent to US$40 million. The US public sector remains the predominant funder of MPT research, primarily through the NIH and USAID, and accounting for 63 percent, 74 percent, and 67 percent of all overall investments in 2014, 2015, and 2016 respectively. Philanthropic investment in MPT research totaled US$4 million in 2016. Compared to the preceding year, private sector investment fell in 2016 and represented 10 percent of overall investment in MPT research.
The MPT field has seen a remarkable increase in investment in the last five years. However, the recent decrease in investment in prevention science, including MPTs, is concerning and should not be ignored. Advocates need to reinvigorate support for this important work and push for the investment needed to drive cutting edge and life changing science that will improve the sexual health of millions worldwide. The IMPT and the Working Group will continue to work together to monitor the progress of the fields and hope to see the needed resources committed to advancing prevention science and saving lives.
###
Since 2000, the Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group (formerly the HIV Vaccines & Microbicides Resource Tracking Working Group) has employed a comprehensive methodology to track trends in research and development (R&D) investments and expenditures for biomedical HIV prevention options. AVAC leads the secretariat of the Working Group, that also includes the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS).
More information about the growth and investment in the MPT field can be accessed in the 2017 IMPT Annual Report.
About the Authors
Fatima Riaz is the Program Coordinator for Research and Data Analytics at AVAC and has an MPH from Columbia University and a certification in Global Health Delivery from Harvard University. Her career started as a student health advocate in Pakistan where she founded and led a national polio advocacy campaign, and has since worked with the World Bank, the International Rescue Committee and UNICEF on diverse issues like WASH, violence prevention and maternal child health.
Kathryn Stewart is Deputy Director for CAMI/IMPT and has a Master’s in Public Policy from UC Berkeley with a special focus on maternal and child health. She also holds a BA in Politics and International Relations from Scripps College. Kathryn applies her 20-year experience in sexual and reproductive health prevention, policy, and research to coordinate a spectrum of projects aimed to advance the development and introduction of multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs).
CROI 2018: Highlights and what’s next for advocates
[UPDATED: slides and audio from our webinar series are now available below.]
Historically, the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (more commonly known as CROI) is heavy on basic science and early-phase research. Data from these types of studies were still prominent in 2018 (see Jon Cohen’s excellent Science article on new animal data informing cure and vaccine research). This year the meeting also broadened its lens from the lab to the ways that different strategies are, or might, have an impact in the context of people’s complex lives.
Dapivirine Ring: Guess what, women use it when they know what works!
The dapivirine vaginal ring is a silicone ring containing an antiretroviral that is released slowly over time. It’s been designed to be worn by women for around a month. Two years ago, at CROI 2016, the ASPIRE and Ring Study results showed that the dapivirine vaginal ring is safe and reduces the risk of HIV infection by around 30 percent overall among women enrolled in the study. At CROI 2018, interim data from the open-label extension (OLE) trials of the ring—HOPE and DREAM—showed that the ring reduced risk by 50 percent. In the open-label studies, all participants have been given access to the dapivirine ring to use monthly for up to 12 months. There is no placebo and all participants are told about the safety and efficacy data. Presenting on behalf of the HOPE study team, Jared Baeten (MTN) remarked that the ring data are similar to the oral PrEP OLE data-in those studies too, people were more adherent once they knew the results from prior trials. Final data from HOPE and DREAM, including findings on how well it works in those who use it consistently, will be available in late 2018/early 2019.
What’s Next
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is reviewing available data on the ring under a framework that allows it to provide regulatory guidance for developing countries. Its decision is expected in late 2018. Will the world be ready with investments, introduction plans and advocacy? Experience to date says: only if advocates work at local, regional and global levels to demand advance planning and action.
Women’s Vaginas: They’re amazing and important to HIV (duh!)
A biome is a large naturally occurring group of plants or animals in a given habitat. The vaginal microbiome is the naturally occurring group of bacteria that live in women’s vaginas and-depending on the proportion of different bacteria present at a given time-keep us healthy or may make us uncomfortable or even put us at risk. The relationship between the vaginal microbiome and HIV acquisition has been a focus at several recent conferences. It was highlighted again in a plenary presentation at CROI.
Nichole Klatt (University of Washington) presented data on what happens when there is an imbalance between good and bad bacteria, a condition known as vaginal microbiome dysbiosis. When researchers looked at vaginal bacteria and different antiretrovirals in lab studies (in vitro), they found that microbiomes with an imbalance towards bad bacteria showed some degradation of topical tenofovir and dapivirine. In other words: it could be that women with such imbalances who are adherent to a vaginal microbicide or the dapivirine ring might still have lower levels of drug in their genital tissue than what is needed for adherence.
It’s incredibly important to understand how the microbiome impacts HIV risk and vaginal health, including the presence of topically applied ARV-based prevention. It’s also incredibly important to remember that these data do not say anything about how oral tenofovir-based PrEP works for women. Oral PrEP arrives in genital tract cells in completely different ways than topical PrEP. To date, data from the human trials of both oral PrEP and dapivirine ring haven’t shown any difference in effect in women with bacterial vaginosis, which is good news. Additional data will continue to shed light on this important and continuing story. And in the meantime, the take-home is still that oral PrEP works for women and that so far there has been no difference in levels of protection in the ring studies linked to dysbiosis.
What’s Next
Advocates need to be on the frontlines of explaining what these vaginal microbiome data do and don’t tell us. We can’t afford misinformation suggesting that oral PrEP doesn’t work in women. We also can’t afford to ignore the complexities of all bodies-female, male and trans-and how they impact prevention and treatment.
Pregnant and Post-Partum Women Need HIV Prevention
A presentation from Renee Heffron (University of Washington) provided more evidence that pregnant and post-partum women are at increased risk of HIV infection. She and colleagues analyzed data from two studies of over 2,700 serodifferent couples. They found that women who were pregnant or post-partum were 3-4 times more likely to acquire HIV. Implications for care and prevention include counseling, more testing, treatment for male partners and woman-controlled prevention options like oral PrEP.
What’s Next
2018 will see many discussions of pregnancy, contraceptives and HIV risk as the many stakeholders prepare for data from the ECHO trial. ECHO is looking at three different methods (DMPA, copper IUD and Jadelle implant) to see if any have an impact on women’s HIV risk. These data are an essential reminder that HIV risk is driven by many things-including pregnancy. Advocates need to push for PrEP in the ante- and post-natal context, contraceptive choice, programs that diagnose male partners and link them to effective ART-and more. Data and global and national guidelines on the use of oral PrEP (e.g., the WHO technical brief on preventing HIV during pregnancy and breastfeeding in the context of PrEP) and the dapivirine ring for pregnant and post-partum women are essential.
PrEP Use Increases but Disparities Persist
Access to PrEP was woven throughout the CROI program, as data on PrEP programs and use continues to accumulate. Findings from San Francisco and Australia both showed a significant uptick in PrEP use and reduced infections (primarily in men who have sex with men) but across both of the studies racial and ethnic disparities in access remained largely unchanged. A new analysis from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), also presented at CROI, found that two-thirds of those who could benefit from PrEP are African-American or Latino and yet prescriptions for these populations remain stubbornly low. Gaps in access were seen across racial groups but were most stark among non-white populations.
What’s Next
A continued fight for health equity as part of a broader social justice agenda in America-and around the world.
Undetectable=Untransmittable
In a meeting known for a focus on basic science, conversations about the Undetectable=Untransmittable campaign and its role in reducing stigma were frequent and welcomed. And for the first time there was a plenary session on mental health at which presenter Robert Remien (HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Columbia University) called for stepped up mental health services to achieve the 90-90-90 goals.
What’s Next
Advocates have consistently been at the frontlines of demanding a holistic approach to prevention and treatment—here’s more data to fuel the fight.
Products in the Pipeline
While there was an increased focus on implementation work this CROI, true to form the meeting also featured plenty on data from early-stage research. Among the hundreds of posters and oral abstract presentations a couple stood out including a non-ARV vaginal insert-designed to prevent HIV, HSV-2 and HPV infection-from PopCouncil and the long-acting ARV from Merck (MK-8591) to prevent HIV. Given favorable animal data, both products are being considered for clinical development.
What’s Next
A major scientific-literacy and agenda-setting push so that advocates can join researchers and product developers to guide decisions about how these trials will be designed and when and where they will happen.
Keep the Conversation Going
Join us for a post-CROI webinar series! Dig into the data with researchers and discuss with fellow advocates how these findings can inform our advocacy work moving forward. Register today!
- Latest on the Dapivirine Ring with Zeda Rosenberg and Jared Baeten; Thursday, March 29 — slides and recording available
- Risk of HIV for Pregnant and Post-Partum Women with Renee Heffron and Kerry Thomson; Wednesday, April 11 — slides and recording available
- Introducing Oral PrEP: A step-by-step framework, tools and updates; Wednesday,
April 18 — slides and recording available
And stay tuned for announcements on additional webinars!