In 2016, funding for HIV prevention R&D decreased by 3 percent (US$35 million) from the previous year, falling to US$1.17 billion. Funding in 2016 signals the lowest annual investment in HIV prevention R&D in more than a decade.
Global HIV Prevention R&D Investment by Technology Category, 2000-2016
Not To Be Missed: New report on funding for prevention research
The span of a decade—that interval that’s neither too long nor too short to bring innovation—is one that’s often used in the HIV prevention research space, usually to convey optimism. Back in 1997, then President Bill Clinton called for a national commitment to develop an AIDS vaccine within ten years. Just this week, Bill Gates said, “With the right leadership and investments over the next decade, we can discover and deliver a vaccine for HIV.”
The success of these forward-looking claims has always depended on sustained funding. Note, in both cases, the emphasis on commitment and leadership. No one is promising a vaccine with anything less. A look back at the last ten years provides a warning on this front. Released today, the Resource Tracking for HIV prevention R&D Working Group’s latest annual report on global investment into biomedical HIV prevention reports that overall funding for HIV prevention research and development (R&D) has remained essentially flat for over a decade.
- Click here to download the full Report and here for a one-page summary
- Click here for the press release
- Click here for an infographic from AVAC’s new issue of Px Wire
Close followers of the annual “RT” report take note—a preliminary version was released at AIDS 2016 in Durban in July. The final version contains slightly updated data and the same overall messages: with a slight fall from US$1.25 billion in 2014 to US$1.20 billion in 2015, overall funding for HIV prevention research and development (R&D) has been more or less level for the past ten years.
And what a decade it’s been! Consider the developments in PrEP, the pipeline of injectable ARVs for prevention and treatment, the continued advance of the ARV-containing vaginal dapivirine ring, and the insights and advances that have come from sustained scientific inquiry related to the search for an HIV vaccine. These are exciting times. And the fact that all of this happened in the context of flat funding for research doesn’t mean that flat funding will get us where we need to go next. As Tom Hope, PhD (Northwestern University) stressed at an opening plenary of the HIV R4P conference where the report was launched, the fact that funding is declining concurrent with new discoveries is a major challenge for the field.
The report notes that preventive vaccine research funding constituted the bulk of all investments, followed by investments in microbicides, TasP, PMTCT, PrEP, VMMC and female condoms. With the exception of vaccines and female condoms, every other HIV prevention option tracked by the working group experienced a decline. These trends are somewhat reflective of the cyclical nature of large-scale clinical trials—when trials end, funding drops off. Likewise, as some interventions enter full scale rollout, like VMMC and TasP, research in this arena can be expected to slow down. Nevertheless, the overall trends bear close watching and strong advocacy to ensure that research continues.
The right products need to be tested in the populations who need them most. The report is also a powerful reminder that this isn’t necessarily how research works. It provides information on the demographic breakdown of almost 900,000 participants in ongoing HIV prevention trials in 2015, with the majority of these volunteers residing in sub-Saharan Africa, most notably Uganda, Kenya, and South Africa. Only one in eight trial participants in 2015 belonged to a population most affected by HIV, including MSM and transgender women, injection drug users, and cisgender women.
These sobering facts come in the context of a vigorous period in research and development. It’s a time of growing recognition from the global community that research has to be part of the long-term fight to end the HIV epidemic. Taking stock of all that’s been accomplished with ten years of flat funding, now is the time to support continued progress with additional, well-targeted resources.
The Resource Tracking Working Group hopes that this tool provides strong facts for advocacy and supports efforts to assess public policy and its role in accelerating scientific progress. We thank all of the individuals who contributed data to the report and who gave time and effort as trial participants.
Check out the report, share it with your fellow advocates, and be sure to let us know if your organization is either a funder or recipient of HIV prevention grants or if you have further questions or information about resource tracking at all!
Press Release
A Decade of Flat Funding Could Imperil Progress of the HIV Prevention Research Pipeline
Contacts
AVAC: Kay Marshall, kay@avac.org, +1-347-249-6375
IAVI: Arne Naeveke, anaeveke@iavi.org, +1-212-847-1055
A PDF version of this press release is also available.
Report released at HIV Research for Prevention Conference highlights funding trends, opportunities and challenges for HIV prevention R&D
Chicago – A new report released today at the second HIV Research for Prevention Conference in Chicago documents 2015 funding, highlighting a decade of flat funding and its potential impact on continued innovation in the HIV prevention research and development (R&D) field.
The Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group’s (RTWG) 12th annual report, HIV Prevention Research & Development Investments, 2000-2015 Investment priorities to fund innovation in a challenging global health landscape, finds that funding for R&D of new and emerging prevention options decreased slightly in 2015. This was due in part to decreases from the US public sector and a downswing in global philanthropic funding.
Steady progress in R&D for AIDS vaccines, microbicides, pre-exposure prophylaxis using antiretroviral drugs (PrEP) and treatment as prevention (TasP) confirms science’s critical role in providing solutions to end the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Yet research for these badly-needed solutions is in danger of being slowed or even sidelined by inadequate funding.
“It is critical that investments into HIV prevention innovations, science and technology are scaled up to put us firmly on the Fast-Track to ending AIDS by 2030,” said Luiz Loures, Deputy Executive Director, UNAIDS.
In 2015, funders invested a total of US $1.20 billion across R&D, down from US $1.25 billion in 2014, across eight key areas: preventive AIDS vaccines, microbicides, PrEP using antiretroviral drugs, TasP, HSV-2 vaccines and operations research related to voluntary medical male circumcision, female condoms and prevention of vertical transmission.
The report also finds that investment is being made along all phases of the research pipeline but remains concentrated among a few large investors. A more diverse base of funders would increase the stability of R&D financing and cushion the impact if any of the major funders were to reduce their investments. To improve continuity, RTWG calls for a more balanced funding base, especially through support of new investment by European and low- and middle-income countries. The US public sector (primarily via the National Institutes of Health) remained the largest global contributor at US$850 million, accounting for 70 percent of total funding. Together the US government and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the largest philanthropic funder, accounted for 81 percent of all funding in 2015.
“There is now very strong momentum in research and development, and we need to expedite the development of vaccine strategies and other new, biomedical prevention options that promise to be safe, accessible and effective for use throughout the world,” said Mark Feinberg, President and CEO of IAVI. “There must be adequate and sustained investment at all stages from early laboratory research and to clinical testing if we are to truly be able to contain the HIV pandemic and approach and end to AIDS.”
This is indeed a time of great optimism for HIV prevention research. Daily oral PrEP is gaining traction as a new prevention option in an increasing number of countries; an antiretroviral-based microbicide ring that showed modest efficacy earlier in 2016 will be further evaluated to determine its viability as a prevention option for women; large-scale efficacy trials of an AIDS vaccine candidate and an injectable form of PrEP are slated to begin soon and a novel proof-of-concept trial of antibody-mediated prevention is underway in several countries. Many more promising candidates in earlier stages are progressing toward pre-clinical and clinical evaluation.
Importantly, 2015 saw increasing investment in the science of delivery – or implementation research – primarily focused on delivery of TasP interventions. Such investments will become even more important to help ensure new prevention options move quickly and efficiently into prevention programs and begin to have an impact on HIV infection rates. There is also an increasing understanding that research must understand and integrate the needs and desires of people who will eventually use new prevention options. Ensuring that the perspective of those for whom new prevention options are being developed is included from the beginning of the research process can help ensure that safe and effective products can be rolled out swiftly and be more fully accepted.
“Innovative science needs innovative funding,” said Mitchell Warren, AVAC Executive Director. “We need an expanded and more diverse global cadre of funders who will be involved in and dedicated to advancing HIV prevention R&D, including product delivery. And these investments need to ensure that new options like daily oral PrEP, and potentially the dapivirine vaginal ring, do not sit on the shelf unused because we don’t know how to effectively deliver them, and that future R&D better meets the needs and wants of those for whom products are developed.”
The report and infographics on prevention research investment are online at www.hivresourcetracking.org and on social media with #HIVPxinvestment.
###
Since 2000, the Resource Tracking for HIV Prevention R&D Working Group (formerly the HIV Vaccines & Microbicides Resource Tracking Working Group) has employed a comprehensive methodology to track trends in research and development (R&D) investments and expenditures for biomedical HIV prevention options. AVAC leads the secretariat of the Working Group, that also includes the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). This year’s report is additionally made possible by the support of several donors, including IAVI, UNAIDS, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the American people through the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of AVAC and the Working Group and do not necessarily reflect the views of PEPFAR, USAID or the United States Government.
MPT Product Development: Many possibilities for MPT development
This table shows the indication (prevention effect the product is designed to have—e.g., pregnancy or one or more STIs) the way it will be delivered (e.g., through vaginal gel, pill or injection), how it might work to provide preventive effect (for example, as a physical barrier to prevent fluid exchange or as a hormonal contraceptive) and what kind of dosage could be possible (e.g., daily pill or application, sustained through the blood or around sex).
Excerpted from the MPTs factsheet.
ARV-Based Prevention Pipeline
The pipeline of ARV-based prevention products includes oral pills, vaginal rings, vaginal and rectal gels, vaginal films, long-acting injectable ARVs. Not pictured are a range of multipurpose technologies in development that aim to reduce women’s risk of HIV and STIs, and provide effective contraception.
Biomedical Prevention in 2016 – At a Glance
A snapshot of prevention strategies underway or under development from 2015-2020. Excerpted from AVAC Report 2016: Big Data, Real People.
HIV Prevention Research Status Report
A survey of prevention strategies and the status of their safety and efficacy. Excerpted from AVAC Report 2016: Big Data, Real People.
New! AVAC Report 2016 Big Data, Real People: The annual state of prevention advocacy
If you’re packing for Durban, we hope you’ll pause right now and add to your bag AVAC’s annual state of the field, Big Data Real People. The full PDF, Executive Summary and graphics are available here.
As always, AVAC Report is our annual advocacy analysis, with an agenda that spans the next 12 months—and beyond. We’ve designed it be a clear, succinct, actionable statement of the strengths and weakness of HIV prevention data today—and we hope you’ll join us in amplifying these messages at next week’s gathering.
Even if you’re not heading to Durban, we hope that this year’s Report will top your packing list for the journey through the next 12 months of advocacy and action.
In the Report, we argue that the state of HIV prevention data collection in 2016 is poor. One part of the solution lies in the adoption of “HIV Prevention Data Dashboards”. This tracking tool could bring the same specificity and accountability to non-ART prevention services that the “treatment cascade” of diagnosis, initiation, retention and virologic suppression does for antiretrovirals for people living with HIV.
The world cannot even pretend that ending AIDS is possible without action on non-ART prevention. We need to roll out what we have, continue R&D on what we still need, as well as scale up ART for all people living with HIV. That’s what the new UNAIDS Prevention Gap report says. That’s what AVAC has said for years. That’s what we hope you’ll say in Durban and over the coming year.
Here’s the Report, a roadmap for the coming year. Please read it, join us on the journey, let us know what you think!
Press Release
Data gaps hinder global efforts to reduce HIV infections, AVAC report warns; improved data collection and reporting needed to meet looming global AIDS targets
Contacts
Mitchell Warren, mitchell@avac.org, +1-914-661-1536
Kay Marshall, kay@avac.org, +1-347-249-6375
In a report issued today, AVAC warned that major gaps in global HIV/AIDS data stand in the way of delivering HIV prevention advances to millions of people who need them most. The report identifies several critical weaknesses of today’s HIV prevention data collection and monitoring systems and offers a concrete roadmap for closing these gaps. The report, Big Data, Real People, was issued ahead of next week’s International AIDS Conference in Durban, South Africa (July 18-22), where advocates will demand action to speed HIV prevention research and delivery.
“In an era in which big data are expected to improve essentially every part of our lives, there’s no excuse for HIV prevention data systems to be so uneven, incomplete and inefficient,” said Mitchell Warren, AVAC’s executive director. “To have any chance of ending the epidemic by 2030, we need to be collecting and accounting for every bit of useful information from every person living with or at risk for HIV.”
The need for improved HIV prevention data systems is particularly pressing given the UNAIDS “fast-track” goal to reduce new annual diagnoses to no more than 500,000 by 2020. Earlier this month, UNAIDS reported that the number of new HIV infections has remained near 2 million per year for the past decade.
Report identifies specific HIV data gaps, recommends solutions
AVAC’s report focuses on four critical data gaps that must be addressed to effectively prioritize, target and measure the impact of efforts to develop and deliver HIV prevention advances.
Specifically, today’s HIV prevention data are:
- Not sufficiently broken down by age, gender, income status, key population status and other vital categories
- Missing or incomplete for key populations most in need of prevention, including adolescent girls and young women, men who have sex with men, transgender women, and others
- Not tied to useful HIV prevention metrics and indicators, so that it is impossible to know whether prevention programs are actually averting infections and improving health
- Not effectively informing the HIV prevention research agenda
To overcome these weaknesses, the report outlines three critical strategies that should be pursued most urgently:
1. Standardize and systemize data collection and reporting for HIV prevention
Understand, measure and report on the risk level of people testing HIV-negative; create and measure linkages to evidence-based prevention for people at substantial risk; and use a standardized “Prevention Data Dashboard” to continually evaluate progress. Such dashboards would consolidate and arrange available data to illuminate critical prevention gaps and help the global community, governments and funders better conceptualize their HIV prevention programming and evaluation. AVAC’s report provides a model dashboard for decision-makers to adopt.
2. Improve use of data for adolescent girls and young women
Ensure that a growing volume of available data can be applied in a meaningful way. As a first step, funders, implementers and governments need to do a better job of defining and segmenting this population; map who is investing in what and where; put adolescent girls and young women in control of core aspects of the data-collection enterprise; and adopt gender-specific indicators tailored to girls and women.
3. Put research on the “fast-track” and countries at the center
Fit biomedical HIV prevention research into comprehensive prevention plans tied to national targets for incidence reduction. Countries and research institutions must invest time and resources in stakeholder engagement; ensure that research priorities are informed by epidemiological and other quality HIV data; and develop national research plans for meeting the prevention needs of specific, affected populations.
The new report and related resources, including downloadable graphics, are available now at www.avac.org/report2016.
###
About AVAC: Founded in 1995, AVAC is a non-profit organization that uses education, policy analysis, advocacy and a network of global collaborations to accelerate the ethical development and global delivery of AIDS vaccines, male circumcision, microbicides, PrEP and other emerging HIV prevention options as part of a comprehensive response to the pandemic.
MPT Products in the Pipeline: Selected highlights
This table shows which MPTs are further along in testing for both sustained-release and on-demand products. Women will have different needs and preferences throughout their lives. An array of different types of products is key to meeting the varying needs of different women. Excerpted from the MPTs factsheet.